home Scooter BBS weather popular pages search the old BBS


 

Subject: "Bowling for Columbine" Archived thread - Read only
 
 
Conferences > International Anything BBS > Topic #1001
Reading Topic #1001

Buzz Bomb Kirk
unregistered user
Nov-29-03, 11:25 PM (EDT)
 
"Bowling for Columbine"
 
   I just saw this movie and had to cut it off after an hour and a half. I expected it to be somewhat slanted, but that was just about laying on it's side.

What a total load of horseshit.


 

 
John M Stafford
Member since Jun-3-02
9072 posts
Nov-30-03, 00:34 AM (EDT)
 
1. "RE: Bowling for Columbine"
In response to message #0
 
   You only hated that movie because you're a right-wing fascist Bush lover.

Enjoy,
John M. Stafford


 
Buzz Bomb Kirk
unregistered user
Nov-30-03, 12:11 PM (EDT)
 
4. "RE: Bowling for Columbine"
In response to message #1
 
   Right wing? Maybe. Bush lover? Far from it.

I'm a libertarian, and frankly I have just had it with the media. I do believe that for the most part the media is slanted slightly to the left (drastically to the left in cases like NPR) but then someone like fox news comes along and says they are "fair and balanced"....what a lie. They are just slanted the other way. It's just about impossible to get any kind of news or anything else that doesn't have some kind of slant on it.

I was interested in seeing bowling for columbine because I thought it seemed like a cool idea for a documentary, but it just seemed more like a two hour long rant that went all over the place and was just horribly slanted. I turned it off when they were talking about the 6 year old girl who got shot in school, and they said the reason was because dick clark "forced" this lady to work (making fudge for rich people) for her food stamps. total bullshit.


 
lensmith
unregistered user
Nov-30-03, 01:32 PM (EDT)
 
6. "RE: Bowling for Columbine"
In response to message #4
 
   totally agree with your assessment of the media here in the U.S. By the way, it's not limited to the US. When I lived in France, I used to see the news showing Ronald Reagan & you could hear his voice, but the voiceover was totally twisting his words to meet their view.

Most of what passes for "news" isn't anyway. How many hours do the "news" shows have to spend on what we don't know about the Michael Jackson case? It's really current events based entertainment, not news. Or maybe tabloidism?

Anyone have a journal or paper they read that seems to be truly "fair & balanced?" If you alread replied to this question in my later post, please disregard.


 
Lancelot
unregistered user
Nov-30-03, 04:37 PM (EDT)
 
10. "RE: Bowling for Columbine"
In response to message #4
 
   >Right wing? Maybe. Bush lover? Far from it.
>
>I'm a libertarian, and frankly I have just had it with the
>media. I do believe that for the most part the media is
>slanted slightly to the left (drastically to the left in
>cases like NPR) but then someone like fox news comes along
>and says they are "fair and balanced"....what a lie. They
>are just slanted the other way. It's just about impossible
>to get any kind of news or anything else that doesn't have
>some kind of slant on it.
>
>I was interested in seeing bowling for columbine because I
>thought it seemed like a cool idea for a documentary, but it
>just seemed more like a two hour long rant that went all
>over the place and was just horribly slanted. I turned it
>off when they were talking about the 6 year old girl who got
>shot in school, and they said the reason was because dick
>clark "forced" this lady to work (making fudge for rich
>people) for her food stamps. total bullshit.


Actually, you missed the larger picture after turning it off. The point made was that it's not the availability of the guns, or even our "violent" history, but rather the absolute absurdity of the news media and 'fear' that is pumped into our everyday lives by that all knowing box we dedicate more to than our families.

Actually, Kirk, he was saying just what you are...perhaps less eloquently and in all kinds of directions, but there really was a good point to the movie.

-L


 
SCOTT
unregistered user
Nov-30-03, 01:51 AM (EDT)
 
2. "RE: Bowling for Columbine"
In response to message #0
 
   I cant stand that Gearge Carlin wannabee fake!

SCOTT


 
David K
Member since Jun-7-02
4579 posts
Nov-30-03, 03:58 AM (EDT)
 
3. "RE: Bowling for Columbine"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON Nov-30-03 AT 04:14 AM (EDT)
 
You know what's interesting to me is that I can't exactly see how anyone on the Right side of the gun issue would get annoyed by that movie. In it, he makes the points that:

1) He's a gun owner.
2) He's a lifetime member of the NRA.
3) Canada, up until recently, had more guns per capita than the United States, yet it has one of the lowest violent crime rates in the world. (That, to me, is one of the strongest, and least used arguments in defense of gun ownership.)

He pretty much makes the case that most gun owners make that guns are just tools, and not the actual problem. But he goes further to query:

1) Why do we have one of the highest violent crime rates in the world?
2) What can we do to prevent more Columbines? (From there, the one tangible, short-term step he proposes is to get retailers to make certain types of ammunition more difficult to obtain and more expensive to buy. But he makes it very clear in the film that there are much bigger problems that must be solved in the long term.)

The movie's main conclusions, if anything are that the USA's problem with violent crime is way too complex to blame on any one thing, but that we are a pretty fearful, violent culture (and that culture of fear and violence has more to do with events such as Columbine than we're willing to admit). And frankly, those conclusions aren't too far-fetched or politically slanted. Hell, just turn on your TV news if you don't believe we live in a self-perpetuted culture of fear and loathing. Orange alerts, or child abduction panics, anyone?

PS: The only thing that he does in the movie that would outrage gun nuts is that he questiosn why in the hell the NRA finds it necessary to immediately hold rallies in towns that are suffering the pain and loss of a high-profile gun tragedy, such as Columbine. Chuck Heston bleating out his threadbare "from my cold dead hands" spiel while families are still greiving is not only insensitive, but utterly idiotic from a PR standpoint.

PPS: I think you need to rewind the tape and watch it again. This time, tune out the fact that Michael Moore is behind it, and actually pay attention to the overall thesis that is developed.

David K

In my dreams, I slash your tires.

BTSC
http://www.burgundytopz.com


 
Fiveacres
Member since Jul-27-03
1891 posts
Nov-30-03, 12:45 PM (EDT)
 
5. "guns suck"
In response to message #3
 
   LAST EDITED ON Nov-30-03 AT 12:46 PM (EDT)
 
im sure bowling for columbine is scheduled to be shown here in england next weekend on terrestrial tv.

ive been wanting to see it for a while now so im glad it is finally being shown. im quite certain though that the film aside from being very intersting, will just highlight one of the problems in one part of the world. - how many kalashnikovs etc, are there in the middle east for example?

i live in a virtually gun free culture over here - especially cos i am kinda in a small city in the countryside too.

from my point of view, there only seems to be a gun culture if you live in larger city (although i know there are silly little muppets trying to be "cool" with them here), but even still we all know that gun crime is on the way up. however from what i have seen over in the usa, we are still a long way behind you guys.

it doesnt help here that its mostly rap bands, who are picking up on, and glorifying owning guns. They are constantly being busted by the law for having them loaded in their bling-bling cars. but it doesnt portray a good example cos they are in the media alot through their music.


i await the movie!

sorry, i had to rant for a minute there.

------------------------
http://fadedhalo.com


 
frank
Member since Jun-3-02
1573 posts
Nov-30-03, 02:24 PM (EDT)
 
7. "RE: guns suck"
In response to message #5
 
   Gun cultures are EVERYWHERE, some people are better at keeping it quiet then others. You would be surprised at what the guy down the street has in the basement.

I went to pick up a WW2 german rifle from a guy in the next town over. Small town, petty crimes. HOLY SHIT did that guy have some crazy stuff. A couple rocket launchers, tons of automatic weapons....almost anything you can think of. All you need is the right license. I'm friends with his business partner who has a large collection himself and he has taken me out to the range a few times to try out all his toys. The sten is a fun one, although it's quite a crude design.

I watched the movie as of recent and I think it's way too long. You could have fit all that in a half hour special. There were some good points made but I just about fell asleep. The US has a lot of problems and there really is no one answer to solve it. The guns themselves are not the problem as Canada can prove, although removing them is the easiest answer. If you ban all guns, then the only people who will own them are cops and criminals.....talk about being fucked.


frank



 
milans1
Member since May-13-03
2952 posts
Nov-30-03, 03:52 PM (EDT)
 
8. "RE: guns suck"
In response to message #7
 
   <<The guns themselves are not the problem as Canada can prove, although removing them is the easiest answer. If you ban all guns, then the only people who will own them are cops and criminals.....talk about being fucked.>>

If you watched the film to the end you will know that your assesement that Canada has a same problem is very wrong.

Banning guns works, in Britain, even cops don't carry guns.

"Look, all I know is that this cord here was plugged into my house, and your house was glowin' like the frickin' sun. So I put two and two together there, and decided you're pissin' me off."


 
SCOTT
unregistered user
Nov-30-03, 05:20 PM (EDT)
 
11. "RE: guns suck"
In response to message #8
 
   Having the criminals with guns and the cops without is crazy. Over in England the problem is getting worse, with guns being made more available in the black market. The past five times I have been there has been a shooting. No way compared to the US, but there regardless.

So, banning guns here in the US will never work.

SCOTT
not a gun owner.


 
Fiveacres
Member since Jul-27-03
1891 posts
Dec-01-03, 08:27 AM (EDT)
 
22. "RE: guns suck"
In response to message #11
 
   where abouts in england did you go?

------------------------
http://fadedhalo.com


 
SCOTT
unregistered user
Dec-01-03, 10:24 AM (EDT)
 
23. "RE: guns suck"
In response to message #22
 
   Well, when I was a kid I lived in Leeds, and Maidenhead. That was back in 1980. My dad lives there now and I visit him usually every year. So, Harrow, Harrow on the Hill, and now Ruislip.
As far as travelling when in the UK I have mainly stayed in the south.

SCOTT


 
frank
Member since Jun-3-02
1573 posts
Nov-30-03, 07:46 PM (EDT)
 
15. "RE: guns suck"
In response to message #8
 
   I didn't say Canada had the same problem. They don't have any problems, but they have lots of guns.

"The guns themselves are not the problem as Canada can prove"

frank



 
Yvette
unregistered user
Dec-01-03, 10:48 AM (EDT)
 
24. "RE: guns suck"
In response to message #8
 
   >Banning guns works, in Britain, even cops don't carry guns.>

Couldn't be further from the truth. In fact, since Britain banned guns their violent crime rate (with use of guns) has done nothing but rise.
Banning guns (or anything for that matter) does nothing but create a black market that's unregulated and untaxed.

Yvette
Imperial SC
"Violent Yet Prissy."


 
Fiveacres
Member since Jul-27-03
1891 posts
Dec-01-03, 08:23 AM (EDT)
 
21. "RE: guns suck"
In response to message #7
 
   im not denying the cultures arent there, but to be honest, i dont get to see them. although we do hear about them on the news and stuff.

its true our everyday police dont use guns, but cos of the rising levels of gun related crime, they are heading more towards carrying weapons.
they have to wear stab vests now, and i can see that before long guns will be the norm for them.

i remember going to ibiza a few years ago for a drinking holiday, and crapping bricks when i was approached by a copper with a gun. heh.
they aint afraid to use em over there!

------------------------
http://fadedhalo.com


 
milans1
Member since May-13-03
2952 posts
Nov-30-03, 05:49 PM (EDT)
 
12. "RE: Bowling for Columbine"
In response to message #3
 
   LAST EDITED ON Nov-30-03 AT 05:49 PM (EDT)
 
<<(That, to me, is one of the strongest, and least used arguments in defense of gun ownership.)>>

It sure would be better for NRA's cause to use the Canada argument rather than the old stupid: "cars kill people too"

For the last time:

Cars are designed for driving
Guns are designed for killing

BIG difference.....

"Look, all I know is that this cord here was plugged into my house, and your house was glowin' like the frickin' sun. So I put two and two together there, and decided you're pissin' me off."


 
Buzz Bomb Kirk
Member since Jun-4-02
1565 posts
Nov-30-03, 07:27 PM (EDT)
 
14. "RE: Bowling for Columbine"
In response to message #3
 
   "PPS: I think you need to rewind the tape and watch it again. This time, tune out the fact that Michael Moore is behind it, and actually pay attention to the overall thesis that is developed."

I don't even know who Michael Moore is....well, I guess I do now. I am admitedly much more right wing since I have gotten married, had kids and moved to the burbs...but I still try to keep an open mind about everything, and I was really hoping to see a good documentary, and like I said, this was almost nothing but - well, for lack of a better word propoganda. Total bullshit that kept on going all over the place, from welfare to the gulf war, to racism, to gun control etc etc. It was just a rant.

For the record I LOVE guns, but don't have any now because I have two little girls, and I had a kind of scary gun experience not too long ago. I think there are too many guns out there, and that there are too many idiots that have them. I hate republicans and I hate democrats even more. I am a libertarian - I want the government out of my fucking life altogether.

I'm getting pretty far off topic here. I should just say that I was severly disapointed...I was expecting a DOCUMENTARY on gun control and instead I got one person's rant on everything they think is wrong with everything. He has the right to do that all he likes and produce that, and shit, I'd probably watch it anyways. I just wish that someone could have at least refrained from calling this a "documentary".

Watching elephants fuck on the discovery channel....now THATS a documentary!
Buzz Bomb Scooters
kirk@buzzbombscooters.com


 
John M Stafford
Member since Jun-3-02
9072 posts
Nov-30-03, 10:13 PM (EDT)
 
19. "Kirk, forget the guns, buy a cowbell..."
In response to message #14
 
   That is all.

http://mknx.com/v/cowbell.wmv

Enjoy,
John M. Stafford


 
Buzz Bomb Kirk
Member since Jun-4-02
1565 posts
Dec-01-03, 12:01 PM (EDT)
 
25. "RE: Kirk, forget the guns, buy a cowbell..."
In response to message #19
 
   That's funny as hell. I am showing that to my wife when I get home.

Buzz Bomb Scooters
kirk@buzzbombscooters.com


 
milans1
Member since May-13-03
2952 posts
Dec-01-03, 10:58 PM (EDT)
 
26. "RE: Bowling for Columbine"
In response to message #14
 
   Oh, OK. You LOVE guns but you say you are libertarian because you want the government out of you life all together? Aren't those both RIGHT WING arguments?

Not nitpicking here, I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh either because I think he's a dick. You have every right not to watch Michael Moore's film...

Everything you see is bias in some way. Documentaries are offically a FACTUAL film genre but there are no rules. It's called artistic license. It's someone's (elses) reality...

"Look, all I know is that this cord here was plugged into my house, and your house was glowin' like the frickin' sun. So I put two and two together there, and decided you're pissin' me off."


 
milans1
Member since May-13-03
2952 posts
Nov-30-03, 04:00 PM (EDT)
 
9. "Documentary and News / Apples and Oranges"
In response to message #0
 
   I really don't understand why people think that documentary films are supposed to be bias? And all the fucking uproar about that Reagan film not being 'accurate'. It's a FILM, not news or real life. Same goes to Mel Gibson and his Jesus saga. Who gives a crap? It's one man's view. Stop comparing NEWS (factual) and documentary that is supposed to express filmmaker's opinions and style. Incidentally, I haven't heard anybody complaining about the Bush's 9/11 TV farse being inaccurate.....

As for BFC I agree with David to the last word.

"Look, all I know is that this cord here was plugged into my house, and your house was glowin' like the frickin' sun. So I put two and two together there, and decided you're pissin' me off."


 
scott
Member since Jun-6-02
4280 posts
Nov-30-03, 06:34 PM (EDT)
 
13. "I saw right thru Chlorine..."
In response to message #9
 
   Chock full of propaganda from start to finish!! Salba representing Stalin, Reuler representing JFK, TA representing Nancy Reagan!
Hey Milan, on your next "documentary" try not slanting all your so called "facts" Ok??

sheesh...



scott

"I forgave my enemies,
but I never forgot their names" DBL


 
milans1
Member since May-13-03
2952 posts
Nov-30-03, 08:21 PM (EDT)
 
16. "RE: I saw right thru Chlorine..."
In response to message #13
 
   LAST EDITED ON Nov-30-03 AT 08:26 PM (EDT)
 
Actually it was quite funny because Salba demanded changes before the final master. He was scared of a label lawsuit because he refered to Bush as 'cokehead' and he said "that's not proven". So to make it fair and balanced I had to take the Coke reference out and put the Clinton reference in so everybody's happy. Delgado and Reuler strongly objected of Bush reference being in the film at all because 'we are at wartime' and we shouldn't say that president is a 'country bumpkin' and make fun of him. Back in communist days, where I lived, people were less scared to say what they think than in Bush's 'free country' today. Does that tell you something?

"Look, all I know is that this cord here was plugged into my house, and your house was glowin' like the frickin' sun. So I put two and two together there, and decided you're pissin' me off."


 
scott
Member since Jun-6-02
4280 posts
Nov-30-03, 09:09 PM (EDT)
 
17. "RE: I saw right thru Chlorine..."
In response to message #16
 
   You should make the outtakes available!! I heard if you play the dvd backwards you can hear a complete recording of Mein Kampf...



scott

"I forgave my enemies,
but I never forgot their names" DBL


 
lensmith
unregistered user
Nov-30-03, 09:29 PM (EDT)
 
18. "RE: I saw right thru Chlorine..."
In response to message #16
 
   >Back in communist days, where I lived, people were less scared to say what they think than in Bush's 'free country' today. Does that tell you something?

Small difference: in Carlsbad or Oceanside no one is likely to drag you off to disappear like in many of the old communist regimes when you were a detractor.

Here the only reason media people "hold back" is fear of lawsuits, not reprisal.

Which communist regime did you live under?


 
milans1
Member since May-13-03
2952 posts
Dec-01-03, 00:06 AM (EDT)
 
20. "RE: I saw right thru Chlorine..."
In response to message #18
 
   I don't know, you should try and stand with "Stop Bush" sign somewhere in Oceanside. It wouldn't take long before someone will "drag you off to disappear"...

I grew up in former Yugoslavia. Not as hard core as Eastern Block countries.

"Look, all I know is that this cord here was plugged into my house, and your house was glowin' like the frickin' sun. So I put two and two together there, and decided you're pissin' me off."


 

 

 






Custom Search


International Scooterist BBS