home Scooter BBS weather popular pages search the old BBS


 

Subject: "More tax $$ well spent" Archived thread - Read only
 
 
Conferences > International Anything BBS > Topic #1034
Reading Topic #1034

scott
unregistered user
Dec-05-03, 03:02 PM (EDT)
 
"More tax $$ well spent"
 
   http://www.msnbc.com/m/pt/printthis_main.asp?storyID=1001396


 

 
SOC
unregistered user
Dec-08-03, 11:30 AM (EDT)
 
1. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #0
 
   >http://www.msnbc.com/m/pt/printthis_main.asp?storyID=1001396

Well, seeing as obesity puts a huge drain on European healthcare sytems, they are looking at doing similar stuff here. Fighting fat is actually not that dumb an idea if you look at it. The average person in my country is nine pound heavier than they were 10 years ago, which isn't good, and our obesity levels are a fraction of those inthe United States, so trying to encourage parents to avoid feeding junk food to their kids is a good idea.


 
scott
Member since Jun-6-02
4280 posts
Dec-09-03, 02:57 PM (EDT)
 
3. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #1
 
   But do we need a government study to tell us a steady diet of McDonalds & Burger King will make you fat? It seems to me that all these studies accomplish is telling us which Burger joint will make you fatter faster. We don't need obesity studies, we need parents to use common sense and take responsibilty for their children. You can't control them as they get older, but if teach them basic guidelines, they'll be ok. I'd rather my tax $$ went toward a new smart bomb or something!


scott

"I forgave my enemies,
but I never forgot their names" DBL


 
David K
Member since Jun-7-02
4579 posts
Dec-09-03, 04:26 PM (EDT)
 
4. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #3
 
   LAST EDITED ON Dec-09-03 AT 04:38 PM (EDT)
 
"we need parents to use common sense and take responsibilty for their children."

Unfortunately, many do not. Following the common sense theme of this thread, I think it stands to reason that parents who keep poor dietary habits impart those bad habits on their kids. Thus, the great circle of glutonous fat bodies continues ad nauseum.

But I entirely agree with your "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" (God I love puns) stance. The notion of trying to address obesity after people have become obese is bass-ackwards. We should concentrate on making sure people don't become fat in the first place -- much better for the national health, and a much cheaper solution. THat's why I think better health care, diet, and exercise education should be taking place in the schools.

Bearing that thought in mind, conservatives should stop pushing for the "market-based" approach to generating school funds by allowing fast food to be sold in school cafeterias. That sends the wrong message and encourages the same kinds of bad habits we all want to see stopped. Don't mean to bounce the ball into your political court, scott, but you have to admit that this has been a past conservative cause.

PS: Diet and exercise aren't the only life skills that should be taught in schools. If we want highschools to teach kids how to drive and not get VD, then we also ought to have schools teach them how to balance their checkbooks, handle basic personal finances, etc. I love how we graduate kids from high school with little knowledge in the way of managing money, and then they go to college and amass mountains of credit card and student loan debt. Not only does this hamper the "future of America," it isn't good for the economy.

David K

In my dreams, I slash your tires.

BTSC
http://www.burgundytopz.com


 
John
Member since Jun-6-02
5724 posts
Dec-09-03, 10:13 PM (EDT)
 
5. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #4
 
   >"we need parents to use common sense and take responsibilty
>for their children."
>
>Unfortunately, many do not. Following the common sense theme
>of this thread, I think it stands to reason that parents who
>keep poor dietary habits impart those bad habits on their
>kids. Thus, the great circle of glutonous fat bodies
>continues ad nauseum.
>
>But I entirely agree with your "an ounce of prevention is
>worth a pound of cure" (God I love puns) stance. The notion
>of trying to address obesity after people have become obese
>is bass-ackwards. We should concentrate on making sure
>people don't become fat in the first place -- much better
>for the national health, and a much cheaper solution. THat's
>why I think better health care, diet, and exercise education
>should be taking place in the schools.
>


David, in the book Fast Food Nation, it covers a whole segment on how soda companies and fast food restaurants spend big bucks on sponsoring school cafeterias. The schools essentially have to take the blood money because they are so underfunded and the companies get incredible closed circuit advertising. There are SO many factors regarding fast food and how it is impacting our lives.


>Bearing that thought in mind, conservatives should stop
>pushing for the "market-based" approach to generating school
>funds by allowing fast food to be sold in school cafeterias.
>That sends the wrong message and encourages the same kinds
>of bad habits we all want to see stopped. Don't mean to
>bounce the ball into your political court, scott, but you
>have to admit that this has been a past conservative cause.
>
>PS: Diet and exercise aren't the only life skills that
>should be taught in schools. If we want highschools to teach
>kids how to drive and not get VD, then we also ought to have
>schools teach them how to balance their checkbooks, handle
>basic personal finances, etc. I love how we graduate kids
>from high school with little knowledge in the way of
>managing money, and then they go to college and amass
>mountains of credit card and student loan debt. Not only
>does this hamper the "future of America," it isn't good for
>the economy.

You want to know the funny thing about this? When I went to a ghetto junior high, they HAVE a class that everybody takes that involves balncing your checkbook and handling personal finances. Home economics basically. But when I transfered to a more substantial school for the last two months of junior high, that school had several art based classes and NOTHING that taught home economics! weird.

Unforgiven SC - the NEW home of Unforgiven SC

http://www.unforgivensc.net

Texas is the reason


 
scott spaeth
Member since Aug-3-02
2697 posts
Dec-09-03, 11:30 PM (EDT)
 
6. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #1
 
   >> The average person in my country is nine pound
>heavier than they were 10 years ago, which isn't good,

Just me thinking, but even with an obesity problem, I wonder how much of a gain like that (and I heard an even bigger percentage about the US recently, using a longer time scale, but I can't remember exact numbers) is a reflection not of malnutrition, but its opposite? The average human height has been increasing for the last hundred years or so as high protein diets (particularly daily intake of meat) has become the norm.

I don't doubt that modern diets have gone to shit for too many people - including myself - but I also wonder how reliable the "proof" is.

cheers,
scott


 
SOC
unregistered user
Dec-10-03, 04:45 AM (EDT)
 
7. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #6
 
   >>> The average person in my country is nine pound
>>heavier than they were 10 years ago, which isn't good,
>
>Just me thinking, but even with an obesity problem, I wonder
>how much of a gain like that (and I heard an even bigger
>percentage about the US recently, using a longer time scale,
>but I can't remember exact numbers) is a reflection not of
>malnutrition, but its opposite? The average human height
>has been increasing for the last hundred years or so as high
>protein diets (particularly daily intake of meat) has become
>the norm.
>
>I don't doubt that modern diets have gone to shit for too
>many people - including myself - but I also wonder how
>reliable the "proof" is.

Basically scott, I see the evidence all atround me. People, especially the girls I have to say are much fatter than they were 10 years ago in this country. This is largely due to an economic boom which saw a switch from more physical work to office jobs along with bigger take home pay and richer diet, + a huge upsurge in drinking as people had more money. This has also led to increased diabetes and heart disease and a lot of fat ugly people I like to call chippopotamuses.


 
Stabbitha
unregistered user
Dec-10-03, 09:58 AM (EDT)
 
9. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #7
 
   Not to bust your balls or be the PC POlice, but it has also led to a culture that condones targeting fat people and making them the butt (no pun intended) of our jokes. It's always someone in our society, or maybe in anysociety.


 
SOC
unregistered user
Dec-10-03, 10:54 AM (EDT)
 
10. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #9
 
   >Not to bust your balls or be the PC POlice, but it has also
>led to a culture that condones targeting fat people and
>making them the butt (no pun intended) of our jokes. It's
>always someone in our society, or maybe in anysociety.

Point taken Stabbatha, I just dislike lazy people, and will admit thet the stereotypical image of a lazy person is also usually fat. It's a combination of personal experience and media representation and I should know better.

You are right, I'm wrong and I put my hands up.


 
Stabbitha
Member since May-27-03
1482 posts
Dec-10-03, 02:14 PM (EDT)
 
11. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #10
 
   I wasn't trying to make you feel bad about it. It's just that fatism is *everywhere* to the extent that no body thinks there's anything wrong with it. If the remarks made about fat people were made about Blacks or Asians or Jews or whatever, there'd be a lot more anti-fatist stupport. But they're the new target group and like I said, there'll always be at least one.


 
glenn
Member since Jun-28-02
53 posts
Dec-10-03, 02:49 PM (EDT)
 
12. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #11
 
   If the remarks made about fat people were made about Blacks or Asians or Jews or whatever, there'd be a lot more anti-fatist stupport. But they're the new target group and like I said, there'll always be at least one.
Yes, but those groups have no choice in what race they are. Common perception is that people CHOOSE to be fat due to their poor choices in life. This, of course holds them up to ridicule.


 
Stabbitha
Member since May-27-03
1482 posts
Dec-10-03, 02:53 PM (EDT)
 
13. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #12
 
   First of all I still don't accept that as an excuse to degrade someone. Second of all, I don't know a single fat person who would *choose* to be a size 24 over a size 4. Nor do I know a single fat person who would *choose* to be at risk for type II diabetes, heart problems, and other life threatening health risks. And I especially don't know any fat people who would choose to be ridiculed for their obesity.


 
glenn
Member since Jun-28-02
53 posts
Dec-10-03, 03:16 PM (EDT)
 
14. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #13
 
   Well, I wasn't condoning degrading someone. But being fat isn't just some kind of magic that occurs. People make choices every day. Should I exercise? Should I eat that double cheeseburger? Etc....
People get fat because of choices they make. Whether they admit it or not, most fat people make themselves fat. This isn't rocket science.


 
Stabbitha
Member since May-27-03
1482 posts
Dec-10-03, 08:38 PM (EDT)
 
15. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #14
 
   No you're right it has nothing to do with rocket science. It's cultural, societal, psychological, habitual, genetic, it's a lot of things. You won't find me making a blanket diagnosis for such a large segment of the population. *Some* people get fat because of the choices they make, some people get fat b/c of the choices others made for them early in life, some people get fat from taking prescrips for other things, some people get fat because their parents were fat and their parent's parents were fat, and some people get fat b/c they eat Popeyes everyday (yelch).

Back to the main point, even if someone is overweight b/c they "chose" to, our culture looks the other way when they are made fun of and actively participates in it to boot.

One time in HS, this girl I thought was my friend was overheard saying that all gays should be separated and put into special camps. SOmeone she was talking with asked if that wasn't what had happened to the Jews in Nazi Germany, to which she replied, "Well that was different. They didn't *choose* to be Jewish." So you can see how that argument wouldn't sit well with me.


 
Stabbitha
Member since May-27-03
1482 posts
Dec-08-03, 02:21 PM (EDT)
 
2. "RE: More tax $$ well spent"
In response to message #0
 
   I couldn't read the article b/c the link isn't working, but based on SOC's post I'm assuming it's about fighting obesity, and I have no idea how that can be considered a waste of money. Nutrition in children has been linked to better school performance, and the benefits of proper diet and exercise elude no population.


 
scott
unregistered user
Dec-10-03, 07:59 AM (EDT)
 
8. "This is where $ should go"
In response to message #0
 
   Don't spend millions to tell me that eating Big Macs will make me fat. Use it here instead:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/1002911.asp?cp1=1


 

 

 






Custom Search


International Scooterist BBS