| |
|
Subject: "Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
|
Archived thread - Read only
|
lensmith
Charter Member
|
Dec-05-03, 04:59 PM (EDT) |
|
|
"Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
| |
Part of the left's new attack on the Bush presidency: a "Babes against Bush" website. They're hoping that guys will log in to see the girls, but will be reading the dirt on George W? Oh yeah, that's why ALL the guys will log in, the reading material. Using that logic, the site should be renamed Bimbos against Bush. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?,
SCOTT
, Dec-05-03, 05:33 PM, (1)
- RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?,
chopper, Dec-05-03, 06:44 PM, (2)
- RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?,
Stabbitha, Dec-05-03, 07:42 PM, (3)
- RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?,
Fidget, Dec-06-03, 07:11 PM, (15)
- RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?,
SCOTT
, Dec-07-03, 00:53 AM, (19)
- RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?,
Fidget, Dec-07-03, 06:34 AM, (21)
- RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?,
SCOTT
, Dec-07-03, 11:38 AM, (22)
- RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?,
SOC
, Dec-08-03, 03:47 AM, (24)
- SO SERIOUS,
SCOTT
, Dec-08-03, 10:42 AM, (26)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
SOC
, Dec-08-03, 11:16 AM, (27)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
chopper, Dec-08-03, 11:34 AM, (28)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
SCOTT
, Dec-08-03, 12:02 PM, (32)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
chopper, Dec-08-03, 12:05 PM, (33)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
RH Gumbie, Dec-08-03, 12:29 PM, (34)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
SCOTT
, Dec-08-03, 12:43 PM, (35)
- Here's why,
SCOTT
, Dec-08-03, 01:26 PM, (36)
- RE: Here's why,
SCOTT
, Dec-08-03, 01:49 PM, (37)
- RE: Here's why,
RH Gumbie, Dec-08-03, 01:51 PM, (38)
- RE: Here's why,
John, Dec-08-03, 03:03 PM, (42)
- RE: Here's why,
RH Gumbie, Dec-08-03, 03:19 PM, (44)
- RE: Here's why,
SCOTT
, Dec-08-03, 01:54 PM, (39)
- RE: Here's why,
RH Gumbie, Dec-08-03, 02:15 PM, (40)
- RE: Here's why,
SCOTT
, Dec-08-03, 03:20 PM, (45)
- RE: Here's why,
SCOTT
, Dec-08-03, 03:19 PM, (43)
- RE: Here's why,
RH Gumbie, Dec-08-03, 03:20 PM, (46)
- WOW!,
RH Gumbie, Dec-08-03, 10:53 PM, (47)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
SOC
, Dec-09-03, 05:22 AM, (48)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
SCOTT
, Dec-09-03, 10:20 AM, (49)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
SOC
, Dec-09-03, 10:50 AM, (50)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
SCOTT
, Dec-09-03, 11:16 AM, (51)
- Now Children . . .,
RH Gumbie, Dec-09-03, 01:58 PM, (52)
- RE: Now Children . . .,
SOC
, Dec-10-03, 04:47 AM, (53)
- RE: SO SERIOUS,
SCOTT
, Dec-08-03, 11:53 AM, (30)
- RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?,
dave
, Dec-08-03, 02:26 PM, (41)
|
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-05-03, 05:33 PM (EDT) |
|
|
1. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #0
| |
Yea, a talk show host was talking to one of them about their organization and when asked who the Vice Prez of the US was, the phone call went dead! What will they think of next!? SCOTT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-05-03, 08:29 PM (EDT) |
|
|
5. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #1
| |
I seem to remember when Dubya was running for Pres that he couldn't remember teh names of some promenent European leaders. So I guess this means we'll elect one of these gals to be our next presedent! Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-05-03, 10:50 PM (EDT) |
|
|
6. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #5
| |
Who gives a rats butt about some Euro leader. We are talking about an American who does not know who their vice prez is! SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-05-03, 11:30 PM (EDT) |
|
|
7. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #6
| |
LAST EDITED ON Dec-05-03 AT 11:35 PM (EDT) >Who gives a rats butt about some Euro leader. We are talking >about an American who does not know who their vice prez is! except the current administration would like us all to forget who he is after all (all those nasty connections to Enron after all). How long did he go missing after 9/11 after all! And those Euro-leaders, well maybe if our Pres could remember who they are, we (the USA) might have found a little bit more support from them, now that we want out of Iraq Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-06-03, 02:57 PM (EDT) |
|
|
11. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #7
| |
Nasty connections to Enron? I am sure that France and Germany would have supported Bush if he knew who the leader of whatever country. What?! SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
chopper

unregistered user
|
Dec-06-03, 02:48 PM (EDT) |
|
|
10. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #6
| |
yeah, god forbid we'd want a president who actually knows who the PM of Britain is. or Canada. what foreign policy, eh? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-06-03, 02:58 PM (EDT) |
|
|
12. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #10
| |
What a drama queen!!! SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-06-03, 03:11 PM (EDT) |
|
|
13. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #12
| |
>What a drama queen!!! > >SCOTT "Said the pot to the kettle . . ." Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-07-03, 00:55 AM (EDT) |
|
|
20. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #13
| |
That's cute. So, do you go by Gumbie or Das Twit? Both honorable names. Has your high school's x-mas vacation started yet?SCOTT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-08-03, 02:06 AM (EDT) |
|
|
23. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #20
| |
>That's cute. >So, do you go by Gumbie or Das Twit? Both honorable names. >Has your high school's x-mas vacation started yet? > >SCOTT Oh Scott, did I hurt your poor, poor feelings? Oh soooo sorry . . . Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 10:29 AM (EDT) |
|
|
25. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #23
| |
I'm rubber and you're glue...... SCOTT
Hmmm, this kid stuff is a little fun! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-08-03, 11:43 AM (EDT) |
|
|
29. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #25
| |
LAST EDITED ON Dec-08-03 AT 11:44 AM (EDT) >Hmmm, this kid stuff is a little fun! So you like to play with children? Please see the thread on Micheal Jackson below my fiend. Or at least go see a shrink. Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 11:57 AM (EDT) |
|
|
31. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #29
| |
Only my kids. Oh, and the kids on my soccer team. But then again, my version of play is different to your version, seeing how you think with your previous post. Sicko!  SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
you're right..

unregistered user
|
Dec-06-03, 03:17 PM (EDT) |
|
|
14. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #12
| |
Bush sure is a drama queen. i mean, he got so ruffled after that reporter challenged him to name leaders of any country in the world, and the only one he got was Mexico, that from then on, he didn't do interviews unless they were with people friendly to his campaign. how dare that stupid reporter show how ignorant and stupid the guy is? it's not the media's job to let the people know that their leaders are morons. its the same reason why he only participates in debates when he has the questions beforehand. we should all take a page from your book, and happily elect the most idiotic morons in politics to the highest office in the country. that'll make this country go really far. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
richard

unregistered user
|
Dec-06-03, 09:25 PM (EDT) |
|
|
17. "Jeb ain't too bright either"
In response to message #14
| |
Good old Jeb Bush went to Spain to try to get them to buy more goods from Florida and kept referring to Spain as a republic, when they are a parliamentary monarchy. You would think he would have taken two minutes to look up Spain on the internet to see what type of government they have. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chopper
Member since Jun-9-02
8035 posts |
Dec-05-03, 06:44 PM (EDT) |
|
|
2. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #0
| |
i read it for the articles. honest!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabbitha
Member since May-27-03
1482 posts |
Dec-05-03, 07:42 PM (EDT) |
|
|
3. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #0
| |
URL? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
lensmith

unregistered user
|
Dec-05-03, 08:10 PM (EDT) |
|
|
4. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
lensmith
Charter Member
|
Dec-06-03, 00:32 AM (EDT) |
|
|
8. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #4
| |
Per your request I posted the link above, but don't support the content of the site. Just a clarification. Len |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
glenn
Member since Jun-28-02
53 posts |
Dec-06-03, 02:28 PM (EDT) |
|
|
9. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #8
| |
Oh man, are you kidding? You don't support the content?? This is a perfect calender for all us Bush hating perverts. Dope, Guns, and Fucking in the streets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Stabbitha
Member since May-27-03
1482 posts |
Dec-06-03, 08:29 PM (EDT) |
|
|
16. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #8
| |
That was pretty much understood  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
lensmith

unregistered user
|
Dec-06-03, 10:27 PM (EDT) |
|
|
18. "just so you know I wasn't trying"
In response to message #16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidget
Member since Feb-14-03
920 posts |
Dec-06-03, 07:11 PM (EDT) |
|
|
15. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #0
| |
The kids porn blocker wouldn't let me check that site out. Probably just the title.  ~Scott ~Scott ------------------------- It's all fun and games until someone farts in your helmet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-07-03, 00:53 AM (EDT) |
|
|
19. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #15
| |
You're not missing anything. It's just a sad(and sexist I might add) attempt by the left to put Bush down. SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Fidget
Member since Feb-14-03
920 posts |
Dec-07-03, 06:34 AM (EDT) |
|
|
21. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #19
| |
I kinda thought that's what it was going to be. Without seeing it, I can bet these are paid models, or photo shopped ones, not the actual women I've seen at protests. ~Scott It's juvenile, don't look! http://home.mn.rr.com/t1camp1/Focus.swf
~Scott ------------------------- It's all fun and games until someone farts in your helmet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-07-03, 11:38 AM (EDT) |
|
|
22. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #21
| |
DEFINITELY not women you would see at protests!!!! SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SOC

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 03:47 AM (EDT) |
|
|
24. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #22
| |
>DEFINITELY not women you would see at protests!!!! > >SCOTT Typical.Yet another cracker. Do you really think you can put your whole foot in your mouth? So, according to you, of the 10 million people around the globe who proteted against the war in Iraq, none of them were good looking? The last protest you went on was when? I want you to absorb this, you, yes you SCOTT, are ignorance personified.Did it ever occur to you that Fox News has a vested interest in portray protesters as dreadlocked hippy/anarchist/lesbo/commie types and not ordinary people? I've been on plenty of protests against Bush, 100,000 people in Dublin on one partcular one. 100,000 represents 3% of the entire population of my country on a single protest. Man there aren't enough hippy/anarchists in the country to get a march together 1/50th that size if they all attended. So do a little math and shut the f*ck up as you are embarassing yourself. Try and think things through, or at least just try and begin to think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 10:42 AM (EDT) |
|
|
26. "SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #24
| |
You need to learn to laugh a little. You take things so seriously and are overemotional. Do you need to borrow a tissue? "Typical.Yet another cracker. Do you really think you can put your whole foot in your mouth?" Cracker? So, you are black? Why are you calling me a racist name? "So, according to you, of the 10 million people around the globe who proteted against the war in Iraq, none of them were good looking? The last protest you went on was when?" Look at my first sentence. And the last protest I went to we all had a good time ripping them apart. Thank you. "I want you to absorb this, you, yes you SCOTT, are ignorance personified.Did it ever occur to you that Fox News has a vested interest in portray protesters as dreadlocked hippy/anarchist/lesbo/commie types and not ordinary people? I've been on plenty of protests against Bush, 100,000 people in Dublin on one partcular one." I am sure you have been to plenty, for it gives you some sort of purpose in life. Without that, you are just another boring face in the crowd. And I bet you that alot of those protesters in Dublin were not even from Ireland. Did you know they did that to make their numbers look bigger. Plus, and this is common, for alot of these people it's a subculture. They thrive on the "protest". Many of them at "peace" protests you will find at "????" protests, and so on. "100,000 represents 3% of the entire population of my country on a single protest. Man there aren't enough hippy/anarchists in the country to get a march together 1/50th that size if they all attended. So do a little math and shut the f*ck up as you are embarassing yourself. Try and think things through, or at least just try and begin to think."
No no no, you are the one embarassing yourself, SOC. YOU are the one taking this too seriously! Get a life my man, and have a laugh!
SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SOC

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 11:16 AM (EDT) |
|
|
27. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #26
| |
Ah, bless where would I be without you diddums. >Cracker? So, you are black? Why are you calling me a racist >name? Where I'm from a cracker refers to an barely credible statement. It is not used in reference to a person. >"So, according to you, of the 10 million people around the >globe who proteted against the war in Iraq, none of them >were good looking? >The last protest you went on was when?" > >Look at my first sentence. And the last protest I went to we >all had a good time ripping them apart. Thank you. Like you rip me apart all the time. How scary. I bet your rapier like wit was in overdrive. >"I want you to absorb this, you, yes you SCOTT, are >ignorance personified.Did it ever occur to you that Fox News >has a vested interest in portray protesters as dreadlocked >hippy/anarchist/lesbo/commie types >and not ordinary people? I've been on plenty of protests >against Bush, 100,000 people in Dublin on one partcular >one." > >I am sure you have been to plenty, for it gives you some >sort of purpose in life. Without that, you are just another >boring face in the crowd. And I bet you that alot of those >protesters in Dublin were not even from Ireland. Did you >know they did that to make their numbers look bigger. Plus, >and this is common, for alot of these people it's a >subculture. They thrive on the "protest". Many of them at >"peace" protests you will find at "????" protests, and so >on. No,and this is what you consistently fail to comprehend, I'm an ordinary person that your government pissed off to the extent that I would protest, something I would not normally do. And there were many thousands like me. You always get the loony left at these things, but in this case they were vastly outnumbered. It's just easy to label all protesters as social undesirables on the basis of a small sub-group when it suits your purpose. As to protesters not being from Ireland, that's an incredibly stupid suggestion which I wouldn't bother to refute if I didn't feel that you are, well, not the sharpest tool in the box. Do a little reasearch. There were similtaneous protests in countries all over Europe and the rest of the world, so why would they come to Ireland to protest. I was there, I saw, you weren't. But you aren't interested in the truth.
> No no no, you are the one embarassing yourself, SOC. YOU >are the one taking this too seriously! Get a life my man, >and have a laugh! I'm not remotely embarassed, you make everyone look good. Also I tend only to laugh when something is funny, otherwise people may think I'm mentally defective, or Texan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
chopper
Member since Jun-9-02
8035 posts |
Dec-08-03, 11:34 AM (EDT) |
|
|
28. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #27
| |
"otherwise people may think I'm mentally defective, or Texan" but you repeat yourself 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 12:02 PM (EDT) |
|
|
32. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #28
| |
You nicknamed types must stick together. A big support group for people with nicknames. Fun. SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
chopper
Member since Jun-9-02
8035 posts |
Dec-08-03, 12:05 PM (EDT) |
|
|
33. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #32
| |
you're a member too, Touchy McFeely. meetings are every monday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-08-03, 12:29 PM (EDT) |
|
|
34. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #32
| |
>You nicknamed types must stick together. A big support group >for people with nicknames. Fun. > >SCOTT This from an unregistered user of the BBS. Oh Lowrd, what next? Frogs from heaven? Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 12:43 PM (EDT) |
|
|
35. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #34
| |
I could give a rat's butt if I am registered or not. My birth name is still going to be the same either way, Mr. Twit. SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 01:26 PM (EDT) |
|
|
36. "Here's why"
In response to message #35
| |
>I could give a rat's butt if I am registered or not. My >birth name is still going to be the same either way, Mr. >Twit. > >SCOTT Scott, just a show a point here (not I'm using your name at the momement instead I'm using yours). As you can see, when you're an unregistered anyone can use your name and post as if they are you. being registered keeps this from happening and it also menas I know who I'm shit talkin with after all and not dealing with some type fo clown pretending to be you. Das Twit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 01:49 PM (EDT) |
|
|
37. "RE: Here's why"
In response to message #36
| |
Yea, I know. But the IP address also helps too. SCOTT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-08-03, 01:51 PM (EDT) |
|
|
38. "RE: Here's why"
In response to message #37
| |
>Yea, I know. But the IP address also helps too. > >SCOTT Ya, but that's an extra step and now we share the same group of IP address's (and 2 others).
Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
John
Member since Jun-6-02
5724 posts |
Dec-08-03, 03:03 PM (EDT) |
|
|
42. "RE: Here's why"
In response to message #38
| |
of course, when someone makes a post with an ip address, that they admit to making and then another post is made, using the person's name AS WELL AS THE IP ADDRESS THAT THEY ADMIT TO HAVING POSTED ONCE FROM, they can just deny having made the post. Even though it was from a computer they use. Not that Scott would know anything about that. At all. Unforgiven SC - the NEW home of Unforgiven SC http://www.unforgivensc.net 
Texas is the reason |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-08-03, 03:19 PM (EDT) |
|
|
44. "RE: Here's why"
In response to message #42
| |
Sure John. My thoughts exactly! Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 01:54 PM (EDT) |
|
|
39. "RE: Here's why"
In response to message #36
| |
It's not that easy. It's hard fighting all you liberals since Redneck stopped posting here. I must be the only Bush loving scooterist left standing. I mean, I ride bad ass scooters and listen to punk but I go to church every week and I love Bush. What's wrong with me? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-08-03, 02:15 PM (EDT) |
|
|
40. "RE: Here's why"
In response to message #39
| |
LAST EDITED ON Dec-08-03 AT 02:16 PM (EDT) >It's not that easy. It's hard fighting all you liberals >since Redneck stopped posting here. Actually I know of 3-4 more, but they're all in a 12 step program to get over it all. 8-) >I must be the only Bush >loving scooterist left standing. I mean, I ride bad ass >scooters and listen to punk but I go to church every week >and I love Bush. What's wrong with me? Despite going to church and scootering, there just arn't a lot of Bush supporters out there anymore. Just look at John, he's defintily no Liberal (way more Libritarian). And he seems to dislikes Bush as much as those of us on the Left. And he listens to Punk and rides a scooter! BTW- most people here are not liberals (go back to that psoted definition of Liberal after all). And jsut becouse a person goes to Church on a regular basis, doesn't make em a Right winger. Just look at the Quakers & the Episcoplaians after all. Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 03:20 PM (EDT) |
|
|
45. "RE: Here's why"
In response to message #40
| |
I did'nt write that Twit. SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 03:19 PM (EDT) |
|
|
43. "RE: Here's why"
In response to message #39
| |
Hey, you guys are fun. Now people are pretending to be me. This is great! BTW, I dont go to church. SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-08-03, 03:20 PM (EDT) |
|
|
46. "RE: Here's why"
In response to message #43
| |
>Hey, you guys are fun. Now people are pretending to be me. >This is great! One more reason to register my fiend! >BTW, I dont go to church. you poor guy.
Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-08-03, 10:53 PM (EDT) |
|
|
47. "WOW!"
In response to message #46
| |
I got the last word! SCOTT, you're draggin here! Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SOC

unregistered user
|
Dec-09-03, 05:22 AM (EDT) |
|
|
48. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #32
| |
>You nicknamed types must stick together. A big support group >for people with nicknames. Fun. > >SCOTT Those are my initials, not a nickname. Who's changing the subject now? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-09-03, 10:20 AM (EDT) |
|
|
49. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #48
| |
Was'nt referring to you, Sack Of Crap! (sorry, I had to) SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SOC

unregistered user
|
Dec-09-03, 10:50 AM (EDT) |
|
|
50. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #49
| |
>Was'nt referring to you, Sack Of Crap! (sorry, I had to) > >SCOTT No problem Seriously Coherance Obviated Tireasome Twat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-09-03, 11:16 AM (EDT) |
|
|
51. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #50
| |
That's the spirit, my fine feathered friend!!! SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RH Gumbie
Member since Jun-4-02
7357 posts |
Dec-09-03, 01:58 PM (EDT) |
|
|
52. "Now Children . . ."
In response to message #51
| |
Play nicely. Don't make me get all medevil on you two! 8-) Can't we get back to politics instead o the name calling? Unjoy, Das Twit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SOC

unregistered user
|
Dec-10-03, 04:47 AM (EDT) |
|
|
53. "RE: Now Children . . ."
In response to message #52
| |
>Play nicely. Don't make me get all medevil on you two! > >8-) > >Can't we get back to politics instead o the name calling? > >Unjoy, >Das Twit But he started it Dad! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SCOTT

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 11:53 AM (EDT) |
|
|
30. "RE: SO SERIOUS"
In response to message #27
| |
"Like you rip me apart all the time. How scary. I bet your rapier like wit was in overdrive." You think I rip you apart? Come on SOCCY, give yourself some credit. You are by far good for a laugh, even when you get all teary eyed and emotional! "No,and this is what you consistently fail to comprehend, I'm an ordinary person that your government pissed off to the extent that I would protest, something I would not normally do. And there were many thousands like me. You always get the loony left at these things, but in this case they were vastly outnumbered. It's just easy to label all protesters as social undesirables on the basis of a small sub-group when it suits your purpose. As to protesters not being from Ireland, that's an incredibly stupid suggestion which I wouldn't bother to refute if I didn't feel that you are, well, not the sharpest tool in the box. Do a little reasearch. There were similtaneous protests in countries all over Europe and the rest of the world, so why would they come to Ireland to protest. I was there, I saw, you weren't. But you aren't interested in the truth." You're so easy it's almost getting boring. "I'm not remotely embarassed, you make everyone look good. Also I tend only to laugh when something is funny, otherwise people may think I'm mentally defective, or Texan." There you go again, talking for "everyone"! Common tactic used when a person is backed into a corner. I guess there was a reason my great grandpa and ma left the island. SCOTT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
dave

unregistered user
|
Dec-08-03, 02:26 PM (EDT) |
|
|
41. "RE: Anybody seen the bimbos against Bush website?"
In response to message #24
| |
That's somewhat disturbing, i mean, a lot of the verry right-winged people in europe are against him... wether they're hippies, commies (? hiding in a sixties-bar with the hippies?), neo-nazis, socialists, liberals, nationalists, democrats or treehuggers, there's not a lot of people that support the guy, because of his ignorance. I'm not talking about the invasion, only about the man. Btw, that simplistic right against left wing thing is over, at least in Europe... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|